AI-Driven Enhancement: Uses advanced AI technology to make pictures less blurry and enhance image resolution.The tool then automatically processes the images, enhancing clarity, removing noise, and upscaling images without compromising quality. Users can easily upload their images and choose the appropriate AI model for enhancement. These models include a general model, denoise model, face model, colorize model, color calibration, scratch repair, and low-light model. This photo enhancer operates by employing multiple AI models to address different aspects of image quality. The software utilizes advanced AI photo enhancement technology, making it a robust solution for various image improvement needs. It specializes in making pictures less blurry and enlarging images without any loss of quality. The photo apps of TopazLabs run quite snappy even on relatively small GPUs.HitPaw Photo Enhancer is an AI-driven tool designed to significantly improve image quality and resolution. So, how long will it take when the customes did not spend 1000$ to 4000$ on his GPU? Where it makes differences between noise and details. The app does not allow model changes with sliders, you can not set it to your own needs.ĭenoise Denoises 150 75Mb tiff images in the same time with this GPU. When denoising another image, there were tiles and leftover pixels that it didn’t recognize as noise. You can’t maximize or enlarge the app window, it doesn’t accept drag and drop. The face model did not change anything on an analog test photo. On my 17 Teraflop Radeon Pro W6800 it takes 3 seconds (2 seconds for resize) for 1% point. HitPaw, accepts only internet file types. I’ve complained about this and many others have for over a year now, with no change or response from Topaz. There has to be more efficient way to code and deliver smaller installation than right now. The Topaz products keep getting larger in size and not proportionally improving in their ability to deliver more. That is six times the size for same or lesser results. By comparison with all the models and everything GigaPixel is about 6 GB. By comparison HitPaw AI is maybe now 800 MB download with three good AI models to choose from. My point was that Topaz is releasing large applications, lots of bugs, and somewhat frustrating User interface that keeps changing and pricing structure that is not super clear and also some of their products like Mask AI is abandoned it seems, and that makes people trust the company less. There have been threads about Tiopaz and need to add better face reconstructions of small faces, but so far Topaz have not implemented it. In normal, high res clean images, it delivers similar results to Topaz, some better, some worse, depending on the image, but on average very comparable. So far I’ve tried every AI enlarger that is commercial, didn’t code one myself, but all the commercial options, HitPaw AI new model for reconstructing faces, is so far the best, and superior to Topaz with examples where there are small or blurry faces. I guess the downside is no Mac version, but perhaps they are planing it. So far I’ve seen quite a few similar Online AI photo enhancers, but HitPaw AI has three models now and one it tries to make itself different by being offline app. With the use of few other programs and plug ins in Photoshop its possible to regain some of the lost skin texture or generate new one, and also adding a bit of film grain, makes the faces not look as artificial with extreme cases.īy the way, there is a demo image that comes with the program, it demonstrates how blurry image can be reconstructed with their new Model C for faces. I imagine this is the kind of tech they will start putting in the smartphones soon, because it really changes the smartphone photography. It cleans up the noise, enlarges 4x although its easy to down sample it to any resolution one needs, and best of all and most impressive it can reconstruction faces amazingly well even in difficult situations and the person is recognizable. I use it quote often, and I find it to be maybe best value for low light and low resolution smartphone shots of people. Maybe you need to wait a bit for preview, but I never had an issue with it. I also can’t see the two before-and-after panels you show (I see a single panel) or export the result to view separately when using the trial version. “On the PC, I still don’t know how good the app is because it refuses to generate a preview (“0%” flickers when I hit the Preview button but nothing happens). Anything requiring coding with no decent Graphical User Interface is out of the question for vast majority of users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |